Alito bit of Sandra on the run...Alito bit of Dubya by your side...Alito bit of you makes me want to cry!*
Confused ranting and incoherence ahead. Consider yourself warned.
While filling my coffee mug yesterday at work, I glanced at a newspaper lying nearby and read a headline that almost made me drop the contents and burn my hand. Judge Samuel Alito (almost Chief Justice, nominated to replace Sandra Day O'Connor) says he is willing to revisit a 33-year old landmark judgment Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion in the United States (or rather, outlawed anti-abortion laws) if voted to the Supreme Court. Democrats in the Senate and ordinary people everywhere are worried about this very Republican/Conservative tilting of the Supreme Court. Thank you very much, Mr.Bush.
While each state has its laws regarding this issue, the federal law precedent was established in 1973 with this case. In Oregon, state law has lower restrictions on abortion than is federally deemed the minimum, or so I understand. This place is certainly more liberal and socially conscious than other areas of America I've seen. Before coming here, I was in Ohio which is more conservative for sure, but I saw little of that conservatism living in the liberal shelter of the University town. For naive ears like mine, then, things like the Supreme Court is leaning so right now, that it could repeal what most would now consider a given, the right to medically terminate an unwanted pregnancy, sound a little scary.
I am not declaring any pro-abortion tendencies. I am not even sure if I am pro-life or pro-choice. I cannot bear the thought of terminating a life at any stage, be it as an embryo or a foetus or a twenty-year old fighting a war he was lied to about. All I know is these are personal decisions, and if the law takes away the possibility for even that personal decision to exist as a choice, there's some justification for worry.
Ignoring the nature of this particularly sensitive issue of legalizing abortion, isn't there something amiss in a judicial system that's considering reverting back to what was the status quo three decades ago???
I have maintained for a while now, that the definition of 'progress' in this country is in grave danger. I am not pretending to have closely followed the happenings in the Senate, but the little I hear about is enough to strengthen that fear. Progress can now mean anything from rethinking 33 year long legal precedents, to refusing to acknowledge scientific proof of evolution in favor of teaching about 'intelligent design' in schools to lying to the world about the existence of non-existent WMDs to...grrrrrrrr!!!
While filling my coffee mug yesterday at work, I glanced at a newspaper lying nearby and read a headline that almost made me drop the contents and burn my hand. Judge Samuel Alito (almost Chief Justice, nominated to replace Sandra Day O'Connor) says he is willing to revisit a 33-year old landmark judgment Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion in the United States (or rather, outlawed anti-abortion laws) if voted to the Supreme Court. Democrats in the Senate and ordinary people everywhere are worried about this very Republican/Conservative tilting of the Supreme Court. Thank you very much, Mr.Bush.
While each state has its laws regarding this issue, the federal law precedent was established in 1973 with this case. In Oregon, state law has lower restrictions on abortion than is federally deemed the minimum, or so I understand. This place is certainly more liberal and socially conscious than other areas of America I've seen. Before coming here, I was in Ohio which is more conservative for sure, but I saw little of that conservatism living in the liberal shelter of the University town. For naive ears like mine, then, things like the Supreme Court is leaning so right now, that it could repeal what most would now consider a given, the right to medically terminate an unwanted pregnancy, sound a little scary.
I am not declaring any pro-abortion tendencies. I am not even sure if I am pro-life or pro-choice. I cannot bear the thought of terminating a life at any stage, be it as an embryo or a foetus or a twenty-year old fighting a war he was lied to about. All I know is these are personal decisions, and if the law takes away the possibility for even that personal decision to exist as a choice, there's some justification for worry.
Ignoring the nature of this particularly sensitive issue of legalizing abortion, isn't there something amiss in a judicial system that's considering reverting back to what was the status quo three decades ago???
I have maintained for a while now, that the definition of 'progress' in this country is in grave danger. I am not pretending to have closely followed the happenings in the Senate, but the little I hear about is enough to strengthen that fear. Progress can now mean anything from rethinking 33 year long legal precedents, to refusing to acknowledge scientific proof of evolution in favor of teaching about 'intelligent design' in schools to lying to the world about the existence of non-existent WMDs to...grrrrrrrr!!!
There seems to me, to be more and more interference of the legal and political system into the personal life of Americans. I think people in this country had gotten used to certain freedoms, (like freedom of speech, maybe?) that is suddenly being questioned under the current political and legislative atmosphere. (In fact, I hesitated for a while before deciding to post this! Once again, thank you very much, Mr.Bush!)
This supreme court nomination is one of those rare occasions when the great (grave?!) influence that politics has on the law and hence, on the every day life of people, becomes very clear.
However, all is not doom and gloom...Alito's nomination replaces Harriet Miers', a woman whose lack of qualifications and credibility would have made Bush a bigger joke than he already is. So that's something. I suppose?!
However, all is not doom and gloom...Alito's nomination replaces Harriet Miers', a woman whose lack of qualifications and credibility would have made Bush a bigger joke than he already is. So that's something. I suppose?!
*With apologies to Lou Bega - Mambo # Five!